The Fight
The Litigation.
Holding Them Accountable.
Three law firms and a coalition of scientists are building the largest coordinated legal action against geoengineering in American history.
Legal Strategy
Whistleblower Lawsuit
GeoFight has filed the first whistleblower lawsuit exposing geoengineering and atmospheric contamination programs and how historical weather history is being manipulated in order to justify weather manipulation.
Read the ComplaintEstablishing Causation
To establish legal causation, experts must examine rainwater, soil, and air samples that document elevated concentrations of aluminum, barium, strontium, and sulfur dioxide. This data is paired with peer-reviewed research linking these contaminants to documented health outcomes.
Legal Arguments
We pursue legal arguments and state common law theories asserting that atmospheric programs conducted without informed public consent violate fundamental rights under both federal and state law, including bodily autonomy, environmental protection, and the right to clean air and water.
Key Milestones
Tennessee passes first U.S. anti-geoengineering law, establishing state-level precedent
Florida signs SB 56 (Ch. 2025-157) making geoengineering a third-degree felony
Multiple states throughout the United States engage in passing laws making geoengineering illegal
Wiley publishes peer-reviewed review linking aluminum aerosols to Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and MS
The GeoFight legal coalition formally established with three lead law firms
GeoFight files whistleblower lawsuit (April 22, 2026)
The Contaminants
Four chemicals have been identified in environmental sampling associated with atmospheric programs: sulfur dioxide, aluminum, barium, and strontium. Peer-reviewed research and government toxicological profiles have associated each with adverse health effects at certain exposure levels.
Believe You May Have Been Affected?
We are currently evaluating claims and gathering evidence for potential legal action. Submit your information to request a case review.
Request Case Review